The House of Eliott

the house of eliott

Way back when, in 1991, Miss Peelpants was a fashion-obsessed but never fashionably attired twelve-year-old. It had been all foufy skater skirts, t-shirts and leggings. In my head, it probably all looked very Kylie. In reality, rather less glamorous.

Then, an epiphany. The House of Eliott began on the BBC. I remember most vividly watching it on the one Sunday a month we visited my grandparents, because my Nana had been born in 1920 and enjoyed the reminiscing about the fashions she admired but never wore (just as much as I now get misty-eyed watching Ashes to Ashes).

I suppose it was the first time I really learnt anything about fashion design, beyond doodling rara skirts with felt tip pens on computer paper purloined from my Dad’s office, and it piqued an interest in fashion history which has shaped my life ever since. I knew at that point, I was going to be like the Eliotts. Evie, of course, because she was young and pretty and silly and wore the nicer frocks.

Cut to 18 years later (arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh) and I’m not exactly there. Although I probably benefitted more from having done my degree in costume rather than fashion, giving me a more independent mindset than standard sizing and market trends. And in many ways, dealing in high-end vintage clothes is similar work to that of an old-style couturier. Without the creative input, of course. But there’s still a part of me which aspires to the Eliott sisters. So it was with great delight that I saw UKTV History (now renamed as YeSTERDAY…how pointless!) are showing the series, three episodes back to back on Sunday afternoons and repeated in the evening.

It still exerts the same pull on me. Although I’m not making the mistake (again) of thinking I can get away with a slick black bob, a la Louise Lombard. I’m also enjoying my new viewpoint, as an adult. Which, inevitably, means I’m rather more taken with lovely, sensible Beatrice (Stella Gonet) this time around.

Also, how could I have forgotten how utterly delicious Jack (Aden Gillett) was? I never forsook you, dear Jack, just….forgot slightly.

Perhaps it will reinvigorate the designer within? Perhaps it will inspire me all over again?

Who knows.

In the meantime, I shall simply lap it all up and remember happy evenings watching it with my much-missed Nana. And occasionally giggle as I remember the brilliant French and Saunders spoof, The House of Idiot. Particularly Kathy Burke with the Chelsea buns!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdiZzPFAiCU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EpkF-mdpG8

Edited to add: Seems since the name change of the channel earlier this week, they’re no longer showing it. Damn them!! Now I’ll have to go out and buy the DVDs……*grumble grumble*

Vintage Adverts: Pimm’s Again!

1970s, pimm's, Vintage Adverts

I seem to be strangely captivated by vintage adverts at the moment, so my apologies if my posts are becoming a little ad-orientated. But they are very entertaining, and certainly a far cry from the type of ads Vogue run nowadays…for shame. They’re so generic and boring now!

Another Pimm’s one…

Yes, indeed, there is nothing like a Pimm’s at a time like this. When you’ve got dolled up in your sparkly flapper dress and your stupid husband has turned up in a cricket vest. There’s nothing like a Pimm’s for tipping over his head and making him go and change into a decent suit.

p.s I don’t hate cricket vests, in case any cricketers are offended by my comments. The Fifth Doctor Who was one of my first crushes. Just not as eveningwear. A-thank you.

Fashion Icon: Pamela Des Barres

1960s, fashion icon of the moment, groupies, pamela des barres

Fashion Icon: Pamela Des Barres

I was recently loaned a copy of I’m With The Band and felt a natural affinity to Miss Pamela’s romantic ups and downs. Her desire to find her niche in life is very powerfully expressed and she’s an engaging hostess for her own life story. Perhaps because she was amongst the first recognised groupies, you feel she’s more genuine than most who followed in her wake. She really was genuinely being swept along by the music and the sexual revolution of the Sixties, rather than seeking the celebrity which so many seem to be motivated towards. And, of course, the word ‘groupie’ has different meanings for different people: for the Girls Together Outrageously it was clearly more about comradeship.

She was also attainably gorgeous. Even before I had read the book, I knew her as an absolute style icon. One of the handful of such women who could actually convince me to go blonde, because it just looks so fantastic on her. That soft, hippy look which was usually quite homemade and ramshackle – giving it an extra level of charm. Remnants and rags were stitched together to create dresses which look like they’ve been sized up from a tatty Victorian doll, and she painted the biggest eyelashes I’ve ever seen. Then in the early Seventies she darkened her hair and smartened up her look for a full-on vamp groupie look, with platforms and stockings, curls and lipstick. She still looks incredible now, and from what I hear is an incredibly lovely person. So, Miss Pamela, we salute you!

George Harrison

george harrison, picture spam, The Beatles

Today, George Harrison would have been 66. So here are some photos of the (IMHO) most beautiful and talented Beatle in honour of his birthday.









Pimm’s and Tuffin

1970s, Foale and Tuffin, pimm's, Vintage Adverts

Awww…..now I want it to be summer and to be sat blowing bubbles, wearing fab early Seventies frilly clown-like Foale and Tuffin clothes and drinking Pimm’s.

I’m blowing a big loud raspberry to winter and to my severe lack of F&T clown clothes……I wonder if saying “Pimm’s!” loudly really works?

Website treats of the week….

1970s, biba, katharine hamnett, mr freedom, website listings

I managed to completely forget to come and tell you all about the Biba and the Katharine Hamnett dresses I listed on the site a few days ago. So I’m telling you now, go check them out – they awesome!!

And now I’ve just listed another bevy of beauties over at Vintage-a-Peel. There’s even a Mr Freedom. Now I’m really just spoiling you aren’t I?

Green satin Mr Freedom playsuit and skater skirt set

Black satin/crepe bias chevron Polly Peck evening dress

Adorable bow print ruched dress by Shelana

It’s a Polly Peck week! And this awesome feather jacket would go superbly with the dress above!

And, lastly but not leastly, a fabulous pineapple print cotton skirt by Sportaville with buttons to make Lee Bender proud!

Well knock me down with an ostrich feather….

1940s, 1970s, celia birtwell, kate moss, ossie clark, style on trial

(I’ve been meaning to publish this in response to the dénouement of Style on Trial for a while now, so here it is….)

The Seventies won out in the end. I thought it was a lost cause, quite frankly, because people are so biased against a decade they associate with polyester and bad taste. Irritatingly and blatantly ignoring the fact that man made fibres in various forms have been in steady use in clothing since the 1930s. And bad taste is always with us. As much in the Fifties and Sixties as it was in the Seventies and Eighties, our specs have just got rosier with time passing.
Wayne Hemingway’s impassioned plea for glam, punk, northern soul and disco was certainly appealing to me, but I could also see why Celia Birtwell would question whether any of those clothes look remotely appealing on older ladies. My response to that would have been that I know many women who still wear their Ossie dresses well into their forties and fifties and still look incredible. Everything permitting, I hope I’ll be one of those ladies myself. She commented that forties styles were far more wearable for people of all ages, possibly forgetting that the Seventies (and specifically the likes of her ex-hubby) incorporated a lot of forties silhouettes and styles, updating them and making them sexier and more modern. All of which look gorgeous on older women as well.

So, perhaps the Forties should have won? I certainly enjoyed Lawrence Llewellyn-Bowen’s case for the decade, and was convinced that they would all vote for his era of choice. But in terms of the most rounded decade for fashion, I actually think the Seventies had it all.

Affordable clothing for those who wanted it, in the days before it was all farmed out to children in a sweatshop in Sri Lanka. Vivid, fun, sexy clothes for teenagers and twenty-somethings. Glamorous eveningwear and wearable separates for older, working women. Polyester has its place, and revolutionised the lot of the housewife, but you could just as easily get delicious crepes, jerseys and wool.

Platforms were infinitely superior to spindly little stiletto heels, and they didn’t have to be 6 inches high (unless you were a member of Slade or a very brave woman). Different styles and cultural groups or identities were plentiful. You could wear the general style of the era, or you could choose who you wanted to be.

Hair was fairly low maintenance if you so wished. And there was a style for all hair types. Every other decade (and trend within that decade) seems to have beaten everyone’s hair into submission to one overarching style. Likewise with make-up, there was a general look but fewer rules than before. The preferred female silhouette was natural. Curved but never to excess. Softness prevailed. No corsetted waists, but no severe straightness either.

Men actually cared about clothes. Not about labels in the way they do now. Clothes. They cared about fabric, colour, silhouette. They didn’t give a rat’s behind about looking overly feminine, and to my eye actually look more appealing and masculine in all their satin and tat.

Okay, perhaps not in the case of The Sweet….but I still adore them!


Ultimately it was the best attitude to style we’ve seen for a long time. Trying everything. Experimenting, being brave, making your own choices and not necessarily the same choice as anyone else. There was a good reason the New Romantics were harking back to Glam Rock and, to a lesser extent, disco. There was always a general ‘look’, but no one slavishly followed rules (unlike the mods, rockers, teddy boys and so on). You were expressing yourself.

While I don’t think any era can really be truly hailed as the greatest, and certainly style is a very subjective concept (the word stylish, in fact, makes me think of the word timeless….and thus, a bit dull and safe), I think the Seventies was a very brave but very well rounded choice to make.

Spirit & Destiny Magazine

press

My sincerest thanks to Spirit & Destiny magazine who featured Vintage-a-Peel as their pick for designer labels, within a larger vintage feature, in their March edition. Featuring one of my very favourite frocks as well!


Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to read my horoscope and see if that tall, dark Duran Duran bassist is about to walk into my life….

What??


Odd Conversation on the Nightbus

Uncategorized

Girl: I really like her coat.

Me: *looks in reflection in the window and realises she’s looking at me*

Other Girl: Yeah.

Girl: I wonder where she got it.

Other Girl: Mmmm.

Me: *wonders if can be bothered to go through the whole ‘it’s vintage’ rigmarole with a drunk girl, albeit one with excellent taste, at 2am*

Girl: I want to ask her where she got it.

Other Girl: Don’t do that.

Girl: But I really want to know. Maybe I can ask the girl next to her to ask her.

Other Girl: That’s even worse, just don’t do it.

Girl: But we’re about to get off the bus, then I’ll never know where she got it from.

Other Girl: I know. But that’s what life is all about.

Girl: Yeah, I guess.

For Queen and Country: Rayne Shoes

emma peel, shoes, Things I wish I owned

I find I have become quite, quite transfixed by these shoes just listed on eBay. They sort of look like they should be hideous. In the wrong hands they would have been hideous. But they’re not hideous. They’re beautiful. They’re green, they’re silk, they’re diamante.


Rayne shoes were of a very high quality, being shoemakers to the Queen and all that. Mr Rayne also made the shoes Diana Rigg wore in The Avengers. So you know you’re getting something good with Rayne.

They’re also about a size too small for Miss Muggins here, but please someone with 5½ feet buy them. I can’t promise you won’t be so transfixed that you’ll find yourself staring down at them all the time and keep bumping into people, but it’s probably a price worth paying.

Coooooo, Mavis, ain’t they gawgeous!